From: Chris DiBona (chrisd_at_loc201.tandem.com)
Date: Wed Dec 04 1996 - 17:03:43 EST
I appreciate all the input from the group regarding the 5x86 upgrade question. I was wondering if David Ross could post his impressions on the speed differences with the new chip on his desktop machine.
Chris
----------
From: David Ross[SMTP:ross_at_math.hawaii.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 1996 2:06 AM
To: David Fox
Cc: thinkpad_at_cs.utk.edu
Subject: Re: DX4-74 --> 5x86-100 Conversion Question
With respect to claimed speed improvements if the 701 chip is replaced
with a 5x86, I wrote:
> > If PEP or anyone else is seriously
> > claiming that the new chip will double the speed, they should be
> > willing to back it up with some sort of evidence, or maybe a
> > money-back guarantee:-)
David Fox replied:
> Wouldn't that be AMD's responsibility? I'm interested in hearing
> opinions of how big the improvement is likely to be - you sound pretty
> skeptical.
Neither AMD nor Cyrix (I don't know which chip PEP uses) make claims
about *systemic* speed improvements; this is very difficult, since
system speed is also a function of bus, cache, and BIOS (not to mention
video and drive - both relatively fast on the 701, by the way). This is
a common topic of discussion on several Usenet groups. Despite my
skepticism, I plan to replace the DX2-66 on my home desktop machine with
one of these chips - it is clear that the bottleneck on *that* machine
is the CPU, and anyway for $40-$50 it is worth a shot. However, on the
701 the bus and lack of cache seem to be real problems: for example,
on most systemic benchmarks it runs much slower than my home machine
(though the disk and video are comparable). I'd be really surprised to
see more than a marginal improvement in speed from the upgrade,
certainly not enough to warrant the cost (much more than the $50 the
chip itself costs!)
- David R.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Thu Jan 23 2003 - 09:53:23 EST