Re: Eye strain with 1024 * 768?

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view

From: Randy Whittle (rwhittle_at_usa.net)
Date: Sat Mar 01 1997 - 09:58:53 EST


At 11:04 AM 2/28/97 HST, David Ross wrote:
>> Resolution is not inversly proportional to font size! Since you can scale
>> your screen fonts to any size in Win95, the more pixels to form those
>> characters, the better.
>
>This is not always true. For example, the Terminal font in
>HyperTerminal only gives you a choice of 8 point and 9 point.

        HyperTerminal is a piece of crap. Don't base resolution decisions of font
size on garbage software that Microsoft threw in for free with Windows.
Almost any *real* software package will allow you to change fonts and sizes
you use and/or magnification levels. I'm still using an old 1.0 version of
Procomm Plus for Windows that allows for this.

>Also, DOS apps aren't rescalable (without 'stretching', which looks
>dreadful, at least on my 800x600 Micron).

        If you run DOS apps in a window, then you can do a lot to manipulate their
size. It might be when you purchase the Plus! pack, but there are fonts
just for DOS windows that allow for more size & selection variety for many
window sizes. Hence, just stay in Windows rather than going DOS
full-screen and playing the "stretchy game" and you can use that higher-res
screen in the manner in which it was designed for.

-------
Randy Whittle rwhittle_at_usa.net
Marshall Graduate School of Business at USC http://www-scf.usc.edu/~whittle

I'm for truth, no matter who tells it. I'm for justice, no matter who it
is for or against. I'm a human being first and foremost, and as such I
am for whoever and whatever benefits humanity as a whole. - Malcolm X


New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Thu Jan 23 2003 - 09:53:29 EST