From: David Ross (ross_at_math.hawaii.edu)
Date: Mon Jan 05 1998 - 16:34:05 EST
> I don't understand the focus on 16 vs 32 bit here. THe issue is whether
> the program is 3.1 compatible or not. There are 16 bit programs that work
> on Win95 and do not work on 3.1, and 32 bit programs that work on Win 3.1
> and not on Win95.
>
Quite right, though using '16/32 bit' to refer to W3.x/W95 apps is a
widespread linguistic convention. Sort of like referring to the
language spoken in the US as English.
What I *meant* was that there is a new, multi-threading, true
32bit/W95-only version of Features available for many Thinkpads, but
that the one that came on EPB's machine *should* run find under W3.1.
- David
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Thu Jan 23 2003 - 09:53:52 EST