From: Randal Whittle (rwhittle_at_usa.net)
Date: Sun Jan 04 1998 - 23:09:36 EST
At 12:21 PM 1/4/98 -0500, Robert Munzenrider wrote:
>Perhaps the variation is due to my using Norton version 3.0. One other
>possibility comes to mind: do you have a 701/50mhz?
No. Almost identical specs as you had--75 MHz, 24 MB RAM, etc.
>Now that you mention it, I do dimly recall something in the Norton
>documentation about how the benchmarks aren't comparable across Norton
>version.???? Something such. Unfortunately, mine was a "Borrowed" version
>of Norton and I don't have the docs..., but it is the 3.0 version...
>
>I'll be curious what kind of ratings you'll get with Norton 3.0
3.0 for Windows 95, or the DOS version?
-------
Randal J. Whittle whittle_at_usc.edu (213) 740-7775
Director, Electronic Commerce Program
Marshall School of Business, University of Southern California
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Thu Jan 23 2003 - 09:53:52 EST