Re: (screen-) size... (was 770 price cut)

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view

From: Paul Khoury (pkhoury_at_loop.com)
Date: Tue Feb 10 1998 - 00:30:25 EST


On Mon, 9 Feb 98 16:44:44 EST, Robert Dewar wrote:

><<I have several older DOS apps which are indispensible to me. I could replace
>some of them with their windows upgrades for a combined total of several
>thousand $$. This would give me no added functionality, possibly slow
>performance and create some backwards compatibility problems. I don't consider
>the software broken - but, it necessarily uses bitmapped fonts, and was
>written at a time when Hercules Mono was the highest resolution out there.
>>>
>
>Note that once we get to 1280 x 960 screens, things look at lot better,
>because you can pixel double old 640 x 480 images.
>
Well, that's quite a big step up. I'm still viewing 640*480 on 12" equivalant
screens, INCLUDING the ThinkPad. :(

I didn't know they had 1280*960 out for general use yet!

-- 
Paul Khoury
pkhoury_at_loop.com
http://pkhoury.dyn.ml.org
(if you can't get to the website, then I'm not online)

To request a list of available docuements, reply with DOCUMENTS in the subject line.

Current system statistics: The Operating System/2 Version is 4.00 Revision 9.029 There are 22 Processes with 84 Threads. This machine's uptime is 0d 0h 37m 9s 937ms.


New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Thu Jan 23 2003 - 09:53:56 EST