Re: (screen-) size... (was 770 price cut)

From: Paul Khoury (pkhoury_at_loop.com)
Date: Tue Feb 10 1998 - 10:11:43 EST

• Next message: Paul Khoury: "Re: Notebooks"
• Previous message: Paul Khoury: "Re: Hibernating a 360cse with PC Cards in place"
• Maybe in reply to: Thorsten Jaekel: "Re: (screen-) size... (was 770 price cut)"
• Next in thread: Robert Dewar: "Re: (screen-) size... (was 770 price cut)"

On Tue, 10 Feb 98 07:29:57 EST, Robert Dewar wrote:

><<I didn't know they had 1280*960 out for general use yet!
>>>
>
>No one said they did, at least not in this interchnage, and if they
>did say it, it would be false!
>
Oh, I just misunderstood - things sure go quickly, from 320*400 (or whatever
CGA was) and the original Hercules card, to my ThinkPad 701 (and this machine,
but the best I can display is 640*480).

On question, though, what size CRT is the 14.1" LCD equivalent to?

-- 
Paul Khoury <pkhoury_at_loop.com>
http://pkhoury.dyn.ml.org
(If you get an error, then the server is not online)
Current system statistics:
The Operating System/2 Version is 4.00 
Revision 9.029 
There are 23 Processes with 84 Threads.
This machine's uptime is 0d 7h 29m 37s 679ms.

• Next message: Paul Khoury: "Re: Notebooks"
• Previous message: Paul Khoury: "Re: Hibernating a 360cse with PC Cards in place"
• Maybe in reply to: Thorsten Jaekel: "Re: (screen-) size... (was 770 price cut)"
• Next in thread: Robert Dewar: "Re: (screen-) size... (was 770 price cut)"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Thu Jan 23 2003 - 09:53:56 EST