From: letoured_at_sover.net
Date: Sat Apr 04 1998 - 10:11:32 EST
I think the cost of Warp Connect vs. Warp 4, would make it more logical to
go with Warp 4. --I've never run Warp Connect, but I've run Warp 3 and
Warp 4 on a DX50 with 16mb. Whether they are tolerable or not depends upon
you've seen either on a faster machine.
Personally, I would go with Warp 4 and only install the network features
that you really have to have, and look for more memory too.
FWIW, the minimun ram unsed for networking under Warp 4 are:
The remote access client, 6mb of ram
File & Print Client, 4 mb
TCP/IP Service, 4mb
Netware Client, 2mb
Newwork & Protocol Services, 2mb
System Management client, 1mb
>I've just purchase a refurbrished 701C (DX75
>16MB 720MB).
>On balance, which version of OS2 is better
>suited to this machine to gain the best
>application performance?
>The machine will be configured for network
>access, but no MM functions, and will probably
>substitute PC2 for the WPS.
>Can folks out there comment on the performance
>differences between Warp 4 and 3 on this
>hardware?
>TIA,
>Michael Cole
>cole_at_griffoninc.com
>Michael Cole
>Griffon Associates
>cole_at_griffoninc.com
-- ----------------------------------------------------------- letoured_at_sover.net -----------------------------------------------------------
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Thu Jan 23 2003 - 09:53:59 EST