Re: 560x v. 600

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view

From: Paul Khoury (pkhoury_at_loop.com)
Date: Sun Apr 05 1998 - 03:13:16 EDT


On Sat, 04 Apr 1998 10:16:54 -0500, richard wrote:

>I've been thinking about whether to replace my TP 560 (133mhz, active screen)
>with a 560x or a 600 or to wait for something better.
>
>I've been leaning towards the 560x, assuming the price comes down (currently
>about $3,300 - I assume it will go under $3,000 shortly). From what I read,
>it's about twice as fast as the 560, has a much bigger drive (4gb v. 1 gb), can
>hold much more ram (96mb v. 40mb) and has almost twice the battery life (almost
>4 hrs v. about 2)
>
>The 600 is only about 15% faster than the 560 (PCMag benchmarks). While it has
>a larger, higher resolution screen, it weighs about a pound more and the battery
>life is not as good (about 3:12). I don't use cd-rom's that often, so a cd-rom
>slot is of little interest. And it seems pricey - estimated street price is
>$4,950.
>
If it's that expensive, you might as well consider the 770 if you don't mind the extra weigh too
much, unless the 600 is a faster machine.

Also, does the 600 have a one year warranty? It seems that all 7xx series have a 3 year warranty,
while the 3xx and 5xx have a 1 year warranty (another good thing about my 701).

-- 
Paul Khoury   <pkhoury_at_loop.com>  http://pkhoury.dyn.ml.org
Sent from my ThinkPad 701CS running OS/2 Warp 4.0, Fixpack 5
There are 19 Processes with 72 Threads.
This machine's uptime is 0d 2h 55m 29s 726ms.


New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Thu Jan 23 2003 - 09:53:59 EST