Re: win 98

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view

From: Bill_Abt/CAM/Lotus_at_lotus.com
Date: Thu May 28 1998 - 10:02:51 EDT


I find it to be much faster and stable than 95. Battery life is much,
much, much better on my 770. I get close to 3.5 hours doing development
style stuff listening to music on the CD....

-Bill

rpritz_at_interport.net (richard) on 05/28/98 09:53:42 AM

To: thinkpad_at_cs.utk.edu
cc:
Subject: win 98

My next Microsoft os question relates to Windows98. Anyone have any
experience
with the final version yet?

According to PCMag and CNET, win98 is somewhat slower than win95, although
maybe
not noticeably, battery life is not as good (~15%), stability is better and
networking is better. Does this correspond to anyone's experience?


New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Thu Jan 23 2003 - 09:54:05 EST