From: Paul Khoury (pkhoury_at_loop.com)
Date: Sat May 30 1998 - 20:46:53 EDT
On Sat, 30 May 1998 16:45:10 -0400 (EDT), rj wrote:
>Very interesting discussion. It does lead to the question of how does
>one determine, if at all possible, what the limits of any given system
>is. The article said that this is a hardware situation and it would
>be OS independent. Is it possible that, perhaps, NT might deal with
>this better than Win95?
>
>Somewhere in this thread it was mentioned that the over the limit RAM
>could be used for ram disk or for disk cache. How is this done?
I think the operating system handles this. I would imagine that NT, OS/2, and Linux
would all handle memory a lot better than Windows 95.
For a RAM disk, there should be drivers for 95, NT, OS/2, DOS, and Linux that you
can load up also.
-- Paul Khoury | <pkhoury_at_loop.com> | Sent from my ThinkPad 701CS http://warped.cswnet.com/~pkhoury/index.html (you can link to the TP Assistant from here) Proudly running OS/2 Warp 3/4, DR-DOS/Novell Netware 7.02, and Sun Solaris 2.4
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Thu Jan 23 2003 - 09:54:05 EST