Re: Diff between 600 266 vs. 300 mhz?

From: Albert C. Lee (alee_at_cavecreations.com)
Date: Fri Dec 11 1998 - 19:11:59 EST

• Next message: John G. Olyarchuk: "Re: Diff between 600 266 vs. 300 mhz?"
• Previous message: letoured_at_sover.net: "Diff between 600 266 vs. 300 mhz?"
• Maybe in reply to: letoured_at_sover.net: "Diff between 600 266 vs. 300 mhz?"
• Next in thread: John G. Olyarchuk: "Re: Diff between 600 266 vs. 300 mhz?"
• Reply: John G. Olyarchuk: "Re: Diff between 600 266 vs. 300 mhz?"

Depends on the system you're coming from. I came from a P90 Toshiba,
and a P166 desktop, so I probably wouldn't have noticed the 34 mhz at
all. The 300 does suck a little more battery, and I think I would
have gone with the 266 except the 600E added AGP video, 256 bit
graphics, with 1024x768 24bpp resolution, and a DVD drive. The
gee-whiz features that you can't live without :).

With $800 more though, you could buy an awful lot of RAM. That'd more
than make up for the initial performance slack between the 266 and
300.

-Al

--
Sent by Pop3Now, http://www.pop3now.com
(c) 1998 Cave Creations Corp. All rights reserved.

• Next message: John G. Olyarchuk: "Re: Diff between 600 266 vs. 300 mhz?"
• Previous message: letoured_at_sover.net: "Diff between 600 266 vs. 300 mhz?"
• Maybe in reply to: letoured_at_sover.net: "Diff between 600 266 vs. 300 mhz?"
• Next in thread: John G. Olyarchuk: "Re: Diff between 600 266 vs. 300 mhz?"
• Reply: John G. Olyarchuk: "Re: Diff between 600 266 vs. 300 mhz?"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Thu Jan 23 2003 - 09:54:34 EST