Re: Should I upgrade to 80 MBytes on TP760ED?

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view

From: Bill Morrow (penzance_at_icanect.net)
Date: Wed Mar 10 1999 - 09:05:23 EST


the only way to go to more than 80megs in the 760E series is to get the Apricorn
32meg DIMM carrier.. i've not sold one of those for a while (until yesterday, so i
must get the latest price today)..
760E series does not support SDRAM...

Vincent Poy wrote:

> On Thu, 4 Mar 1999, Yong Whang wrote:
>
> You need to look at the Intel site where the technical specs for
> the chipset is... I don't remember the exact location but I know it's
> there. SDRAM and EDO doesn't really do anything much since the cache is
> more efficient since there has always been Level 2 cache. Except that the
> old one was Asynchronous while the new ones are Synchronous. I think you
> can always ask on a technical mailing list like FreeBSD Questions and
> someone will point you to the correct URL for the site. And there
> isn't a way to turn the cache controller off since the Bios setup doesn't
> have that function.
>
> Cheers,
> Vince - vince_at_MCESTATE.COM - vince_at_GAIANET.NET ________ __ ____
> Unix Networking Operations - FreeBSD-Real Unix for Free / / / / | / |[__ ]
> GaiaNet Corporation - M & C Estate / / / / | / | __] ]
> Beverly Hills, California USA 90210 / / / / / |/ / | __] ]
> HongKong Stars/Gravis UltraSound Mailing Lists Admin /_/_/_/_/|___/|_|[____]
>
> > Can you give me the reference for this?
> > I checked the Intel site (and looked at TX chipset
> > datasheets), but I can't find any statements alluding
> > to this. I would think that if the cache controller is turned
> > off, you'd get like 50% decrease in speed rather than 10% that
> > you measured.
> >
> > On another front, I would think that with SDRAM, upper memory
> > not being cached wouldn't be that bad. I thought that when
> > EDO and SDRAM first came out, their purpose was to get rid of
> > L2 cache altogether. It hasn't happened yet, but...
> >
> > Yong Whang
> >
> > > >
> > > > That's actually wrong... According to Intel engineers and I have
> > > >tested this as well... If the cache controller chipset can only cache 64
> > > >megs, then it will not cache any ram at all if you go past the limits.
> > > >This can all be found on Intel's site.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >Cheers,
> > > >Vince - vince_at_MCESTATE.COM - vince_at_GAIANET.NET ________ __ ____
> > > >Unix Networking Operations - FreeBSD-Real Unix for Free / / / / | / |[__ ]
> > > >GaiaNet Corporation - M & C Estate / / / / | / | __] ]
> > > >Beverly Hills, California USA 90210 / / / / / |/ / | __] ]
> > > >HongKong Stars/Gravis UltraSound Mailing Lists Admin /_/_/_/_/|___/|_|[____]
> >
> >

--
Live Long and Prosper, Happy trails...

** Bill Morrow ** :-) WEB page http://thinkpads.com Thinkpad User Community: http://thinkpads.com/enter.html bill_at_thinkpads.com, morrow1_at_compuserve.com, morrow_at_treco.net 770X-7AU, 760ED, 760CD, (5)701C, 755CE, 750C et al...

Including, but not limited to, Subject to prior sale, Your mileage will vary, Done on a closed road with a professional driver AND Do not try this at home..


New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Thu Jan 23 2003 - 09:54:48 EST