From: Tom Trottier (tom_at_act.ca)
Date: Fri Sep 03 1999 - 00:58:54 EDT
Glad to oblige, Tom
--- Original Message ---
Date sent: Mon, 30 Aug 1999 18:46:27 -0400
To: Douglas Kline <kline_at_head-cfa.harvard.edu>, tom_at_act.ca
From: "STeve Andre'" <andres_at_pilot.msu.edu>
Subject: Re: [LAB] (Fwd) Re: [OM] ...rechargeables... -Reply
Copies to: obc_at_cycling.org, power-assist_at_cyclery.com, chainguard_at_cyclery.com,
labmembers_at_cycling.org, thinkpad_at_cs.utk.edu,
Touring Digest <touring_at_cyclery.com>
> Thanks for asking--I forgot to catch the url for this, and I'm very glad
> you posted this.
>
> I must say, after reading this for 15 minutes, this has got to be the single
> most intelligent discussion on NiCd batteries I have ever seen. Wow.
>
> So I think the poster meant "good intelligent technical discussion". Believe
> me, I've endured lots of the bad kind over the years. This is most refreshing
> to see.
>
> If you are the type who likes to read about technical things, this document is
> really excellent. I need to pass this out in ham-radio circles.
>
> --STeve Andre' (WB8WSF)
> andres_at_pilot.msu.edu
>
> At 06:29 PM 8/30/99 -0400, Douglas Kline wrote:
> ...
> >>
> >> Anyone looking for a good non-single word technical discussion of the
> relativ
> >e
> >> merits of rechargables might try:
> >>
> >> http://www.antonbauer.com/tech/handbook.html
> >
> >What exactly is "a good non-single word technical discussion" or, for that
> >matter, "a bad non-single word technical discussion"?
> >
> >Douglas
>
------------------
From:Tom Trottier, ACT Productions Inc.
__o tom_at_act.ca http://www.act.ca
_ \< +1 613 594-4829 fax +1 613 594-8944
(*)/'(*) 199 Holmwood Ave, Ottawa, Ontario Canada K1S 2P3
"Make it as simple as possible, but no simpler" - Einstein
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Thu Jan 23 2003 - 09:55:19 EST