Re: Good PCMCIA ethernet cards

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view

From: Vincent Poy (vince_at_victor.MCESTATE.COM)
Date: Sun Oct 03 1999 - 01:31:31 EDT


On Sat, 2 Oct 1999, Paul Khoury wrote:

        Maybe a 3Com that uses the XJack? It's better to go with CardBUS
since CardBUS is a 32 bit bus while the standard PCMCIA is 16 bit.
Without Cardbus, you'll get 12Mbps max even for a 100BT card.

Cheers,
Vince - vince_at_MCESTATE.COM - vince_at_GAIANET.NET ________ __ ____
Unix Networking Operations - FreeBSD-Real Unix for Free / / / / | / |[__ ]
GaiaNet Corporation - M & C Estate / / / / | / | __] ]
Beverly Hills, California USA 90210 / / / / / |/ / | __] ]
HongKong Stars/Gravis UltraSound Mailing Lists Admin /_/_/_/_/|___/|_|[____]

> Does anyone have any suggestions for a good PCMCIA ethernet card
> for ThinkPads, particulary the 760? I really like 3COM's cards, but it gets me
> mad that the cables are so darn cheap, and regular use (or my cat) will mess them
> up.
>
> I was looking at the Xircom Realport cards, for use under NT, maybe Win98 or Win2K.
> Has anyone had any experiance with these, or the XJack cards? I doubt I'll be using
> OS/2 on this machine anymore, but just in case, OS/2 support would be nice, but
> not nessecary.
>
> I'm not too familar with Cardbus either. Any pros or cons? I might go the route of 10/100, even
> though my current network is 10BaseT, and will probably remain so for a while.
>
> Paul
>
>
>


New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Thu Jan 23 2003 - 09:55:27 EST