From: William Armstrong (warmstrong_at_waldinc.com)
Date: Tue May 02 2000 - 19:04:30 EDT
Vincent,
Mmmm.... You're right. TalkWorks Pro 3.0 includes WinFax Pro 9.0, not 10.0,
and is not compatible with W2K. Must be something about the voice stuff in
TalkWorks that makes it difficult to get it to work well with W2K. Oh well.
If I remember correctly TalkWorks Pro 3.0 came out before WinFax Pro 10.0.
I never thought that TalkWorks worked with the ThinkPad modems. It didn't
with earlier ThinkPads, but maybe it did with the 770's. Kinda doubt it. The
voice parts of TalkWorks were designed to work with only a small set of
voice chipsets (Rockwell, originally, then 3COM), but did not work with a
bunch of others.
-Bill
-----Original Message-----
From: Vincent Poy [mailto:vince_at_pele.WURLDLINK.NET]
Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2000 6:11 PM
To: William Armstrong
Cc: thinkpad_at_cs.utk.edu
Subject: RE: WinFax Pro 10 ?
On Tue, 2 May 2000, William Armstrong wrote:
Really? I thought TalkWorks Pro is only up to WinFax 9.0 and not
10.0? As forthe voice features, I thought the TP 770Z was compatible with
that portion. GUess not...
Cheers,
Vince - vince_at_WURLDLINK.NET - Vice President ________ __ ____
Unix Networking Operations - FreeBSD-Real Unix for Free / / / / | / |[__ ]
WurldLink Corporation / / / / | / | __] ]
San Francisco - Honolulu - Hong Kong / / / / / |/ / | __] ]
HongKong Stars/Gravis UltraSound Mailing Lists Admin /_/_/_/_/|___/|_|[____]
Almighty1_at_IRC - oahu.DAL.NET Hawaii's DALnet IRC Network Server Admin
> Vincent,
>
> Don't know the difference between WinFax Pro 10 and Mobile WinFax. I
beleive
> TalkWorks has all of WinFax Pro 10 in it, plus the voice features. These
are
> not usable on a ThinkPad. You should be able to find a matrix at the
> Symantec website outlining the differences between Talkworks and WinFax,
> maybe Mobile WinFax, too.
>
> Cheers to you :-)
>
> Bill
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vincent Poy [mailto:vince_at_pele.WURLDLINK.NET]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2000 5:43 PM
> To: William Armstrong
> Cc: thinkpad_at_cs.utk.edu
> Subject: RE: WinFax Pro 10 ?
>
>
> On Tue, 2 May 2000, William Armstrong wrote:
>
> > Buy it. Don't think twice. The photo resolution fax feature is worth the
> > price alone. Also, it's completely W2K compliant.
> >
> > Can't comment on LUCENT Winmodem compatability. I have it in TP770Z with
> > internal modem and on several desktops with and without modems. No
> problems
> > anywhere. This is what one can call "mature" software.
>
> Speaking about WinFax Pro 10, is that version going to be in
> TalkWorks Pro? Also, what's the diff between Mobile WinFax Pro and the
> regular WinFax Pro? Thanks!
>
>
> Cheers,
> Vince - vince_at_WURLDLINK.NET - Vice President ________ __
____
> Unix Networking Operations - FreeBSD-Real Unix for Free / / / / | /
[__ ]
> WurldLink Corporation / / / / | / |
__] ]
> San Francisco - Honolulu - Hong Kong / / / / / |/ / |
__] ]
> HongKong Stars/Gravis UltraSound Mailing Lists Admin
/_/_/_/_/|___/|_|[____]
> Almighty1_at_IRC - oahu.DAL.NET Hawaii's DALnet IRC Network Server Admin
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Thu Jan 23 2003 - 09:56:03 EST