From: letoured_at_sover.net
Date: Tue Jul 04 2000 - 22:52:51 EDT
Chris Schumann" <cschumann_at_twp-llc.com> said:
>> Perhaps I should have been clear on the subject.
>> I can recover from hibernate in 5 seconds, in Win3.1.1.
>> Windows 95, takes much longer, windows 98, you just
>> as well re-boot the machine.
>My ThinkPad 600X manual states that Win98 takes much longer to resume from
>suspend and it's a function of the OS, not the machine. I suspect it has more
>robust recovery for things like networks and such.
>Hibernate should function the same as suspend, except for saving and
>restoring the hibernation file. That file, by the way, is sized according to
>your RAM only. The operating system has no bearing on that, nor does the OS
>even know about hibernation.
>> The new beta windows, that might never see the market, is so big that
>a 701
>> cannot create a HIB file large enough.
>Huh? Again, the HIB file should be sized according to how much RAM you have.
>Keep in mind that thinkpad's like FAT filesystems for the hibernation file,
>and older thinkpad's must have a FAT16 partition.
This must be a limitation of WinX. OS2 can hibernate to HPFS.
-- ----------------------------------------------------------- letoured_at_sover.net -----------------------------------------------------------
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Thu Jan 23 2003 - 09:56:13 EST