From: Allan Ballard (aballard_at_ix.netcom.com)
Date: Fri Sep 08 2000 - 05:18:43 EDT
I am still using Exchange client over DUN, and
it has taken over 20 minutes to logon and partially
pull up the Inbox. Outlook is just the same. I probably
should retract any reference to OE, as experience
with it over a remote connection is limited. Sorry
for any reference to OE. But I would "guess" that
it is much the same as the other two regarding
speed of sending/receiving remotely, and probably
completely takes over the machine when a msg arrives as do the
other two.
DO try the PMMail though, if only for the demo
period. I think you will be pleasantly suprised.
Thu, 7 Sep 2000 22:51:33 -1000, David Ross wrote:
>Allen:
>
>"Exchange client, and it's new brother full Outlook, make
>OE look good by comparison. If you want to live at
>a snail's pace, try any of the three over RAS or DUN."
>
>I'm using OE over DUN right now, but this is v. 5 on W95; is the newer
>version of OE worse?
>
>Turgut:
>
>"Can I seriously recommend PMMAIL? It's an EXCELLENT email program,
>with built-in PGP, folders, filters, multi-accounts, etc."
>
>I cannot use PMMAIL, as it does not support IMAP. The other features
>are all
>included in both OE and The Bat (and other clients to greater or lesser
>extent).
>
>- David R.
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Thu Jan 23 2003 - 09:56:25 EST