From: richard (rpritz_at_rcn.com)
Date: Fri May 03 2002 - 18:53:27 EDT
If you try to reprint and resell a published book, you can be sued for
copyright infringement even if you don't have any direct dealings with the
original author or publisher.
At 11:39 PM 5/3/2002 +0100, John Poltorak wrote:
>On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 06:27:48PM -0400, richard wrote:
> > it may be compete nonsense. but it's the law.
>
>No it isn't.
>
>When I buy a computer, I do not have any direct dealings with Microsoft. I
>enter into a contract with the retailer. I pay the retailer money, I get a
>computer in return. Microsoft has no claims on me or what I can do with
>the goods I bought apart from breaking copyright law which applies to
>everyone not just Microsoft. I have no legal relationship with Microsoft.
>I made no agreement with them.
>
>On what possible basis can they initiate an action on someone with whom
>they have had no exchange?
>
>Please give me a single instance of Microsoft suing a purchaser of a
>computer for failing to comply with the EULA.
>
>It is simply bluff and does not carry any weight at all.
>
>
> >
> > At 11:21 PM 5/3/2002 +0100, John Poltorak wrote:
> > >On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 05:51:03PM -0400, Richard Chalk wrote:
> > > > This is not all-that complicated. One does not buy the software,
> but the
> > > > right to use it. That right is conveyed by the license certificate
> that
> > > > comes with the software, or, in the case of a factory-installed
> > > machine, the
> > > > certificate comes with the machine.
> > >
> > >No, this is complete nonesense.
> > >
> > >How can a person who buys his first computer, gets it home and starts it
> > >be told after the event that he doesn't own the software? It doesn't make
> > >any sense. You never sign anything to say you agree to abide by the terms
> > >of the EULA. It is a complete sham and I doubt whether it has any legal
> > >status at all, at least not in the EU. Software is often consider to be
> > >like a book, from a legal point of view. The book is yours and you can
> > >read it and then sell it. You don't need to ask the authors permission to
> > >do so.
> > >
> > > > The fact that there is software installed on a machine you buy
> second-hand
> > > > does not mean that you have the license to use it. You are
> responsible for
> > > > obtaining the license from the seller, or, alternatively, buying a new
> > > > license, since if you did not receive it with the computer, the
> license
> > > will
> > > > still belong to the original purchaser.
> > > >
> > > > Now, let's all swear on whatever is holy that we adhere rigidly to the
> > > > above.
> > >
> > >This is simply Microsoft speak. As far I'm concerned, if I get Windows on
> > >a system, I am free to do anything I want with it including give it away,
> > >although not making copies of it for sale. I was forced into paying for it
> > >anyway, since I didn't want it. But no one seems to care about this.
> > >
> > >Bill Gates is welcome to come banging on my door if he wants and tell me I
> > >have broken his EULA, but I haven't since it is void, IMV.
> > >
> > > > Richard
> > >
> > >
> > >--
> > >John
> >
>
>
>--
>John
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Thu Jan 23 2003 - 09:58:49 EST