Re: why you should never run windows

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view

From: Andrew Beals (bandy_at_cinnamon.com)
Date: Fri Jun 21 2002 - 12:52:30 EDT


AnimePhreak_at_aol.com said:
> I thought IBM would let you at least have the option of os/2.

Not for a while.

> Anyway,
> if you dont want to use windows just remove it and sell the license.

Hard to do when your windoze comes as only a "restore disk" that is likely
locked to your brand of hardware. In fact, I have a brand-new un-used copy of
XP that's on the restore disk for the Pr*s*r** 4400US that I am in the process
of replacing cinnamon.com [FreeBSD 4.6] with.

> Probably the best way to do it if you dont like MicroSucks. I'd love
> to use linux yet this is the only computer in my house besides a 486
> with a fried cpu

Ask and ye may recieve... I don't toss cpu chips when they still might be
useful. And there's a 486/66 plugged into a motherboard downstairs in the
"junk" bin, destined for recycle.

> and a mac lc(that mac lc is 16mhz). Cant really
> enjoyably run linux on either.

Kids! Back when I was your age, I would have KILLED for a 16MHz machine, 32
bits no less! All I had was eight bits, no subroutine call and a grand total
of 16 i/o ports to work with and 256 bytes of ram. Then when I added an
entire kilobyte of ram to the system, all of my programs BROKE!


New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Thu Jan 23 2003 - 09:59:01 EST