From: David A. Vandenbroucke (davanden_at_Capaccess.org)
Date: Wed Nov 06 2002 - 12:30:07 EST
letoured_at_together.net writes:
>No connection at all. The customer is being harmed without a good or
>rational
>explanation. If they refuse to deliver that -- which is probably required
>under the UCC -- then the rational course of action is to force them to
>deliver it.
>
...and to many people on this list, the first resort is to sue them. If
their employees have the same attitude about workplace hazards, it's no
wonder they rejected the laptop.
--Dav
davanden_at_capaccess.org
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Thu Jan 23 2003 - 09:59:37 EST