From: art (art_at_courvilles.com)
Date: Wed Nov 27 2002 - 15:27:41 EST
Might have been true in the Jurassic period, but it seems
pretty evenly divided now. But it does seem to be true that
the bottom-posters are much more outspoken in their
condemnation of top-posters.
IMHO, this is a noisy list. About average for lists in
general, but pretty noisy for a technically-oriented list.
But there is some good stuff that comes through.
David Ross wrote:
>
>
> You *do* understand I hope that this is the exact opposite from the
> convention that has dominated email and Usenet
> from the Jurassic period, and that so-called 'top-posting' is considered
> a huge breach of etiquette?
>
>
> Noisy? This list? Highest signal-to-noise ratio of any forum I do now
> or ever have subscribed to, even on those occasions when
> we go insane and have debates on things like operating systems and the
> etiquette of top-posting.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Thu Jan 23 2003 - 09:59:40 EST