Re: [Thinkpad] Difference between 72 watt IBM A/C Adapters

From: Bruce Markowitz (scosgt_at_worldnet.att.net)
Date: Fri Nov 29 2002 - 08:56:42 EST

• Next message: Bruce Markowitz: "Re: [Thinkpad] A bit lost among TP models and types..."
• Previous message: No Spam: "[Thinkpad] A bit lost among TP models and types..."
• In reply to: Paul Khoury: "Re: [Thinkpad] Difference between 72 watt IBM A/C Adapters"
• Next in thread: Michael Geary: "[Thinkpad] 72 watt A/C Adapters, Cisco wireless"

I use all the adaptors interchangeably, and have never had any problem
----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul Khoury" <pkhoury_at_earthlink.net>
To: "Penzance - NetFinity" <penzance_at_gate.net>
Cc: "ThinkPad List" <thinkpad_at_stderr.org>
Sent: Friday, November 29, 2002 4:05 AM
Subject: Re: [Thinkpad] Difference between 72 watt IBM A/C Adapters

> On Thu, 28 Nov 2002 21:38:36 -0500, Penzance - NetFinity wrote:
>
> >i have a few or can order new ones from ibm..
> >
>
> While on this topic, do the T series machines exceed the output of
> the previous 56 watt adapters used on 600's and like machines? I'm
> seriously
> looking at buying a T23 in the next month (unless anyone knows a cheap
> source
> for a model with the 1400*1050 LCD, and Cisco miniPCI is a plus), and
> some adapters I have,
> such as the auto adapter (56 watt version, OEMed by Lind Electronics)
> seem more
> durable than their import 72 watt counterparts.
>
> Paul
>

• Next message: Bruce Markowitz: "Re: [Thinkpad] A bit lost among TP models and types..."
• Previous message: No Spam: "[Thinkpad] A bit lost among TP models and types..."
• In reply to: Paul Khoury: "Re: [Thinkpad] Difference between 72 watt IBM A/C Adapters"
• Next in thread: Michael Geary: "[Thinkpad] 72 watt A/C Adapters, Cisco wireless"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Thu Jan 23 2003 - 09:59:40 EST