[Thinkpad] Re: XP uses more resources that 2K??? 2K works fine on 560x

> XP uses more resources that 2K???
> I'm not so sure about that. The little experience I had with 2K was on a
> 770X, P2 300, and it was dreadfully slow.

I've got a 560x (P2 266 96Mb RAM) running W2K and it seems to work fine.
I don't think I could run XP on it at all so that makes me think that XP
requires more resources.
I wanted to compare system resources with my Win98 Lite system but
couldn't find the system resource meter in Win 2K. Does it exist in 2K?
Next I want to try Win2K lite and see how much difference that makes.

-- 
Andrew in Ann Arbor
technology is the answer, what was the question?
_______________________________________________
Thinkpad mailing list
Thinkpad@stderr.org
http://stderr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/thinkpad