Re: [Thinkpad] Memory Max.

You are correct. However, XP is much more plug and play, which I think is
better on a laptop.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dominique Pivard" <domi@kenavo.fi>
To: <thinkpad@stderr.org>
Sent: Monday, May 31, 2004 1:52 AM
Subject: Re: [Thinkpad] Memory Max.

> On Sun, 30 May 2004 at 11:03 PM you, "Bruce Markowitz"
> <scosgt@worldnet.att.net>, said:
>
> >If 2K runs, XP will probably run better.
>
> I seem to remember you're one of the people who jumped straight from Win9x
> to XP, skipping 2K altogether. I assume this is why your knowledge of 2K
> is limited. FWIW, 2K works reasonably well on machines with limited
> resources (like a 560X w/ 96 MB). I used to have a 560X running OS/2; I
> installed W2K on it when I passed it on to our cat-sitter three years ago
> and she's still happily using it. Though I haven't tried it, I'm pretty
> sure XP would feel much slower on that particular machine.
>
> Cheers, Dominique
> _______________________________________________
> Thinkpad mailing list
> Thinkpad@stderr.org
> http://stderr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/thinkpad

_______________________________________________
Thinkpad mailing list
Thinkpad@stderr.org
http://stderr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/thinkpad
Received on Mon May 31 11:32:35 2004